TotalAV vs Avast - Post Thumbnail
Antivirus Comparison

TotalAV vs Avast

It is a hard and simple task to compare TotalAV vs Avast as those antiviruses have many common features, which makes the final decision harder. In general, they have a good reputation as offline and online protectors. Probably, the most significant difference lies in the price difference where Avast requires too high annual fee compared to TotalAV. However, let’s look closer and compare both relying on the basic features like security level, performance, pricing, support, ease of use, and additional features.


Modern digital devices are usually a place where one stores personal information or business data. Losing such info can be made from diverse sides and via numerous approaches, including hacker attacks, installing viruses or malware, and even visiting websites or confirming cookies collection. The absence of strong and complex antivirus everyone is risking to become an easy target.

Both Avast and TotalAV have numerous methods to overcome highlighted problems and possible dangers. It makes them reliable antiviruses to prevent data loss, and they are available to create a full shield of security. Those regarded antiviruses suggest quite similar approaches to save their clients and appropriate hardware:

  • Variety of scanning regimes
  • Deep check of the system
  • Checking USB connections
  • Control of registers
  • Permanent protection
  • Antispyware
  • Detection of phishing
  • Trojan recognition

Everyone can see that both antiviruses present a complex level of security.

Online Security

In recent times, the importance of online security reached a new level, and new security products should efficiently deal with possible issues. Both TotalAV and Avast ensure almost total protection on the internet. Companies present extensions to check both websites and even incoming information for potential danger. Their apps are ready to notify a client in cases of possible stealing essential data.

However, here comes the first notable difference. Thus, Avast does not have Chat and MI safety compared to TotalAV. On the contrary, TotalAV cannot protect the user’s email for incoming danger while Avast gives such a valuable opportunity.


Even though digital products often present similar broad compatibility, a small difference exists. The considered antiviruses are familiar with Windows, Mac, and Android, while TotalAV is presented for iOS devices in front of the competitor. Owners of iPhones and iPads have to be careful choosing complex antivirus protection as Avast will not support some of their gadgets.


Probably, this item bears the most difference between antiviruses. Thus, Avast presents a paid version that requires a $48 per year subscription and $88 if double a period. There also some discounts if many devices are included in one tariff.

TotalAV seems to be much cheaper as entry-level protection costs only $20 per year. Additional variants will cost up to $40 and $60 with opening more security possibilities.

It is vital to mention that both companies suggest a 30-day money-back guarantee.


Another quite similar item for comparison as both companies present excellent support. The ability to access and resolve an issue via phone, email, and visiting broad QA rubric is a good sign. However, live chat is available only for TotalAV clients, which can be regarded as an additional advantage that is still not vital.

Additional Features

Both TotalAV and Avast have interesting additional tips for better security. They are looking as follows:

  • Powerful firewall
  • Virtual Private Network (VPN) service
  • Smartphone optimizer
  • Safe browser

The only difference lies in the ability of TotalAV to offer Device tune-up, while Avast has a unique Gamer Mode that is absent in the competitor’s list of features. Also, there is a lack of parental control in both antiviruses that is a rather useful service.

Now you are ready to make a final decision – we’ve done all we could.